|
July 2008
To Publish, or not to Publish A Major WEB Vulnerability
Dan Kaminsky decided to publish. This young security expert discovered
a
WEB flaw that presented itself to hackers for decades -- who knows how
much it was exploited and by whom? He first notified some major WEB
players -- discreetly, but not much was done in terms of fixing the
problem. So Dan decided on a controversial move: to publish the
detailed flaw for all to see.
The reality is that hackers can jump in on this newly exposed crack,
and victimize in the short run quite a few innocent surfers. Security
countermeasures, by contrast, are elaborate, and must be carried out
independently by all concerned. So only for the long run will this
vulnerability be plugged.
But without this drastic measure, the crack will never be plugged -- so
goes the pro argument.
Was Dan Kaminsky right?
Read More
Do you wish to contribute your thought?
click here
|